I do know I’m a bit late to the occasion, however since there may be little protection of networking gadgets today, I stated why not take a look at the TP-Hyperlink EAP773 myself? And so I received my fingers on this slim half metallic, half-plastic WiFi 7 entry level that rivals Ubiquiti not solely by way of measurement, however by way of worth and options as properly.
Certainly, the EAP773 is a tri-band AP which incorporates the 6GHz radio that may use as much as 320MHz channel width, there’s MLO help, there’s Cloud and native administration, mesh and AI roaming. It ticks just about all of the packing containers, however there may be one different characteristic that I solely noticed on the far dearer WBE660S. We received a 10GbE PoE port.
I have no idea why the opposite producers ignored this necessary piece on their mid-to-entry-level WiFi 7 entry factors, however TP-Hyperlink didn’t and this could enable us to see some spectacular throughput, proper? I believe so contemplating that the WBE660S outdid all different gadgets, which implies that the EAP773 may also have an opportunity. So let’s see it in motion.
The Design and Construct High quality
I did a teardown video of the TP-Hyperlink EAP773 just a few months again and even then I used to be shocked by how slim the entry level was, particularly when in comparison with the EAP670 or the EAP660HD. So sure, gone are the times of cumbersome circumstances and I additionally admire that TP-Hyperlink went with a metallic backside for a greater warmth administration. EnGenius and Zyxel have been utilizing this technique for years and it has labored properly for them.

Ubiquiti is the odd one right here, however it’s getting there, I hope. Anyway, we’re coping with a ceiling-mount entry level and there’s a bracket within the bundle to do the precise mounting. You can’t actually let this machine on a desk since it can simply slip on the ground.
I didn’t see an apparent LED however it’s there, shinning by the plastic prime, exhibiting colours relying on the standing of the community and of the entry level. I all the time assume blue and inexperienced are good, whereas purple or orange are unhealthy. I imply, at this level, what else can we do, the minimalism craze has taken over every little thing. Flip the machine again and we get to see a sunken space particularly devoted to the ports.

And we are able to see one Ethernet port which we all know, is able to speeds as much as 10Gbps. It’s additionally PoE, in fact. Subsequent to it, there’s a 12V DC In port and a small Reset button.
The Thermal Administration
As I discussed earlier than, the TP-Hyperlink EAP773 depends on the underside metallic a part of the case to remove the warmth from the primary elements and there’s no precise air flow gap, that’s the complete system. Does it work or would a fan be higher, as within the case of the U7 Pro and U7 Pro Max?

The thermal digicam that I used right here reveals that it labored pretty properly and the case doesn’t overheat. So, regardless of being smaller and extra compact, there isn’t any want for a fan to maintain issues below management.
TP-Hyperlink EAP773 Teardown
In contrast to different manufacturers, TP-Hyperlink made opening up the case of the EAP773 a breeze. There are six screws that have to be eliminated and that’s about all, the highest panel ought to simply come out. Then, we get to see the PCB, however sure, the primary elements do relaxation on the opposite facet. Not an enormous deal as a result of it solely takes the elimination of some screws. I shortly realized that there isn’t any fancy antenna as on the WBE660S and even the cheaper NWA130BE, however we do get an excellent view of the primary elements. I additionally added a comparability desk with different WiFi 7 entry factors.
{Hardware} Comparability
| TP-Hyperlink EAP773 | Ubiquiti U7 Professional Max | Zyxel NWA130BE | EnGenius ECW536 | |
| CPU | quad-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm IPQ9554 (A73) | quad-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm IPQ5322 | quad-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm IPQ5322 (Cortex-A53) | quad-core 2.2GHz Qualcomm IPQ9570 (A73) |
| RAM | 2GB DDR4 (2x 3KR75 D8BPK) | 1GB Samsung (SEC K4A8G16 SYC 8CTD) | 1GB Micron 3UR77 D8BPK (DDR4) | 2GB (2x Nanya NT5AD512M16C4-HRI) |
| Storage | 128MB NAND Winbond 24N01GWZEIG | 4GB Kingston EMMC04G-MT32 | 512MB (MXIC X233662 MX35UF46E4AD-241)/ 16MB NOR flash (MXIC MX25U12832F) | 512MB NAND (MXIC MX35UF4GE4AD) |
| Swap | Marvell AQrate AQR113C Gen4 PHY | Qualcomm QCA8081 Ethernet PHY | Qualcomm QCA8385 Ethernet PHY | 2x RealTek RTL8261N N2068H3 |
| 6GHz Radio | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 4×4:4 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 2×2:2 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 2×2:2 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 4×4:4/td> |
| 5GHz Radio | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax 4×4:4 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 4×4:4 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11be 2×2:2 | Qualcomm QCN6224 802.11a/n/ac/ax 4×4 4×4:4 |
| 2.4GHz Radio | Qualcomm QCN5024 802.11b/g/n/ax 4×4:4 | Qualcomm QCN6274 802.11b/g/n/ax 2×2:2 | Qualcomm IPQ5322 802.11b/g/n/ax 2×2:2 | Qualcomm QCN6214 802.11b/g/n/ax 4×4:4 |
Single Consumer Assessments (6GHz & 5GHz)
I admit that I used to be anticipating the TP-Hyperlink EAP773 to supply a greater throughput than the opposite WiFi 7 entry factors in the identical worth vary and I used to be proper. I did run just a few single-client checks utilizing WiFi 7, WiFi 6 and WiFi 5 consumer gadgets and we are able to see means over 2Gbps close to the entry level, however not as a lot of a powerful throughput at 70 ft or 21 meters. And that is true so long as I used the WiFi 7 adapter and, in fact, the 6GHz radio.

However switching to the 5GHz made some vital enhancements. And it does appear that the TP-Hyperlink EAP773 is likely one of the few entry factors to make use of the 240MHz channel bandwidth. The sign attenuation graphic does verify that it’s higher to make use of the 5GHz radio if you happen to intend to cowl extra floor with WiFi.

And that’s true each upstream and downstream, as we are able to see within the following graphics.


I did embrace a comparability with different entry factors that I examined through the years and, when utilizing the 5GHz radio and the 80MHz channel width, the EAP773 sits in between the Zyxel NWA130BE and the U7 Professional.

Switching to the 160MHz width, issues do change and the EAP773 sits under the more expensive Zyxel WBE660S.

I used to be very curious how would it not stand when utilizing the 6GHz radio and the 320MHz channel bandwidth, and, as you’ll be able to see, it does take the second place.

Earlier than shifting ahead, I believe it will be attention-grabbing to additionally take a look at how the throughput fluctuates over an extended time period and whether or not a selected velocity is sustained or not.

Single Consumer Assessments (2.4GHz)
Now let’s have a fast have a look at the info I collected when utilizing the two.4GHz radio band and the 40MHz channel width. I used a WiFi 6 and a WiFi 5 consumer machine, the previous performing significantly better than the latter.

Then once more, the two.4GHz radio is healthier left for IoT and sensible gadgets at this second. I’ve additionally included a sign attenuation graphic in case you wish to reproduce these ends in your personal residence or workplace.

When in comparison with different entry factors, the EAP773 isn’t actually a prime performer, sitting under the EAP670.

The Multi-Consumer Assessments
That’s all for the single-client trials, so let’s get an excellent have a look at the multi-client take a look at outcomes. I used net-hydra by Mr Jim Salter as soon as once more and, utilizing a server PC, in addition to 5 wi-fi consumer gadgets, I may simulate numerous sorts of visitors.
I began with 1080p streaming and we are able to see that the WiFi 7 consumer did very well, adopted by the 2 WiFi 6 consumer gadgets which remained below 100ms for at the very least 95% of the time.

The 2 WiFi 5 purchasers climbed above 100ms for fairly at the very least 25% of the time which is loads. The efficiency is just like the Zyxel WBE660S and the NWA130BE, and in addition a bit higher than the U7 Professional.

Subsequent, I simulated 4K streaming visitors on 5 consumer gadgets and the latency was fairly just like what I noticed with the Zyxel NWA130BE and the U7 Professional, which I suppose make sense contemplating all are throughout the similar worth vary. Transferring ahead, I added intense shopping to run alongside 1080p streaming, and we are able to see that a few purchasers did carry out comparatively properly.

It’s not that a lot completely different from the Ubiquiti U7 Professional efficiency. As for the extraordinary shopping graphic, the 2 WiFi 5 purchasers did higher than the remaining, however even these carried out inside limits.

Now, shifting on with the 4K streaming and the extraordinary shopping take a look at, just one WiFi 6 consumer remained beneath 100ms for nearly the complete length. It’s a really related efficiency to the WBE660S for essentially the most half, with solely the ZimaBoard performing a bit worse.

The extraordinary shopping graphic reveals one consumer going above 3 seconds for at the very least 5% of the time which isn’t actually acceptable efficiency.

Let’s now embrace downloading visitors and we can be downloading a 10MB file constantly alongside two intense shopping purchasers and two 4K streaming purchasers. There isn’t any restrict, the purchasers can expend the complete bandwidth.

As you’ll be able to see, the 4K streaming purchasers didn’t play good, whereas the extraordinary shopping was dealt with properly. The downloading consumer wanted 572Mbps of throughput and it remained close to 100ms for 95% of the time which is much better than anticipated. It was higher than the WBE660S which was already superior to the U7 Professional and the NWA130BE. With that in thoughts, let’s now add one other downloading consumer. And issues do change.

One consumer rises up from about 190ms as much as 500ms, whereas the opposite is about 100ms extra throughout the board. Once more, whereas very removed from superb, it’s nonetheless a greater efficiency than the WBE660S which isn’t any small feat. The full throughput for the downloading purchasers was 749.4Mbps. Afterwards, I restricted the variety of purchasers to 3, however stored one downloading consumer.

This manner, we are able to see that it’s not sufficient to vary issues, so I made a decision to simulate the downloading of a 1MB file, hold the extraordinary shopping consumer and add a VoIP one as properly.

The downloading latency stays under 100ms, though much less spectacular than what we received with the Zyxel WBE660S, however much better than the U7 Professional. The opposite two purchasers had been additionally inside affordable limits. Lastly, I made a decision to run the downloading visitors (10MB) on all 5 purchasers and, properly, you’ll be able to see the outcomes for your self.

MLO Efficiency
Since just about all WiFi 7 entry level now have working MLO, I needed to additionally take a look at it on the TP-Hyperlink EAP773. I already examined the Ubiquiti U7 Professional, the Zyxel NWA130BE and the WBE660S, the latter being the most effective performing one. Hopefully, the EAP773 can dethrone it. I’ve included the throughput for the 6GHz radio utilizing each the 320MHz and the 160MHz channel bandwidth.

And, after aggregating the 6GHz with the 5GHz radio, the primary on the 320MHz, the second on the 240MHz channel width, we get virtually 4Gbps close to the entry level. That is certainly the most effective MLO throughput I’ve skilled to date. Then once more, the throughput loses its efficiency after I elevated the gap. Utilizing the 160MHz for the 5GHz radio and both the 320MHz or the 160MHz channel width for the 6GHz radio confirmed a max throughput nearer to 3Gbps, which is according to different WiFi 7 entry factors.

Downstream, we are able to see that the efficiency follows the identical ups and downs, with a extra subdued throughput. You’ll have observed that I didn’t aggregated the two.4GHz radio and the explanation I didn’t is as a result of this feature isn’t out there within the software program.
It might have helped with the throughput when there may be extra distance between the consumer and the entry level, so hopefully it can turn into out there sooner or later. Lastly, I’ve determined to additionally embrace the outcomes that I received whereas operating FLENT.




The Standalone Mode
Now let’s take a look at the software program choices. There’s a standalone mode out there and it does provide just about every little thing it’s good to configure and monitor the community. There are 4 foremost tabs, the primary being the Standing which reveals data concerning the System, the SSID and Radios, in addition to concerning the Purchasers which can be linked to the entry level.

Then, we get the Wi-fi tab the place we are able to arrange the radios and the SSIDs, and sure, that is the place you may also configure the MLO. After all, we additionally get a captive Portal, VLAN help, QoS, Rogue AP Detection and extra. The subsequent tab is the Administration the place you’ll be able to arrange the IP, test the logs, configure the entry ports, management the LEDs and a few extra choices. Underneath System, we are able to replace the account, replace the firmware and allow the Cloud-Based mostly Controller Administration.
The Omada SDN
I did have out there a {hardware} controller, the OC200 which made issues simple for me, however you may also run regionally on a PC. In my case, the EAP773 was detected mechanically and I needed to insert the username and password that I beforehand arrange. Then, after some firmware upgrades, we are able to see the person interface. I did point out a number of occasions through the years that TP-Hyperlink was aiming at Ubiquiti, and I believe it landed as a result of the controller is way more mature and there may be help for a plenty of new sorts of gadgets.

The UniFi familiarity continues to be sturdy, as we are able to see the entry level devoted part on the suitable facet, whereas on the left, we are able to test the Dashboard for international standing data, the Statistics space, and there may be additionally a Map. Underneath Gadgets, we get to see out AP and there’s a devoted Purchasers part. I suppose I ought to point out the Insights and the Logs, each necessary sections to know what’s happening with the community. However let’s not take a look at that devoted part for the EAP773.
We’ve 5 foremost sections right here beginning with the Particulars which covers every little thing from Radios to the LAN and Uplink standing data. Then, there’s the Purchasers part which does embrace a log Historical past, adopted by the Mesh part which can cowl a possible mesh community which I don’t presently have configured. Subsequent, we get to the Config part the place we truly get to arrange how issues work, ranging from Radios, SSIDs, VLANs and going to some Superior choices that embrace QoS and OFDMA. Lastly, we are able to take a look at the Statistics the place we get some stay monitoring instruments out there.
The Conclusion
It took me a bit longer than I might have favored to lastly take a look at the EAP773, however we received right here ultimately. And we found that the EAP773 presents quite a lot of worth for the cash and it’s maybe the most effective WiFi 7 entry factors on the market throughout the entry-to-mid-level {hardware}. In my checks it did higher than the U7 Professional and it even went nearer to the WBE660S in some elements. The software program received higher through the years, so I see little cause why this entry level gained’t find yourself in your shortlist.

Mark is a graduate in Laptop Science, having gathered beneficial expertise through the years working in IT as a programmer. Mark can also be the primary tech author for MBReviews.com, overlaying not solely his ardour, the networking gadgets, but additionally different cool digital devices that you could be discover helpful to your day by day life.
